The site only publishes what an institution or a party has itself published, as is, with a link to the original. And it says clearly what is missing.
This is rule number one. If a piece of information is missing, the field stays empty or the site says so. We do not guess and we do not fill in.
We quote the institution itself, never someone talking about it: British Columbia's Legislative Assembly (leg.bc.ca) for bills, their stages, the recorded divisions written in its Journals, the MLAs and the Executive Council.
Nothing is taken from the press. News outlets have withdrawn their content from use by artificial intelligence, and the site does not read them. What was said at a press conference but never recorded by the Assembly therefore does not appear here. One exception, named on the page where it is used: the October 24, 2026 election result is read from the Wikipedia article on that election, because Elections BC closes its site to automated readers.
If a website asks automated tools not to read it, we do not read it, even when it would be technically possible. That is the case for elections.bc.ca and bclaws.gov.bc.ca: we link to them and read nothing from them. The program that reads official websites identifies itself honestly, and waits the pace a site asks for when it sets one. We never work around a CAPTCHA or an anti-bot protection. The MLA email addresses shown here are the legislative addresses the Assembly publishes itself, so that people can write to their members — and nothing else: no personal address, no constituency-office address. When access is blocked, we write to the organization to ask for permission.
Names are copied from the Assembly's Votes and Proceedings, the only place they are recorded — never inferred from party membership. Most bills pass on a voice vote: the absence of a recorded division does not mean “unanimous”, and the site never writes that it does.
Committees — Committee of the Whole, Committee of Supply — sit in Section A, B or C with about a dozen members. Their divisions are not a vote of the House: counting them would make almost everyone look absent. The published rate therefore keeps only divisions of the House, and the glossary says how it is calculated.
The site never says a bill is good or bad, nor that a vote was the right one. It places the facts side by side, each with its source. You are the judge.
The full text is one click away from every bill. Plain-language summaries are not written yet: each page says so, rather than showing something written without having read it. If anything differs, the original document is the one that counts. The site is independent and has no official status.
When a source is absent or incomplete, the page says so and says why. An absence must never be read as silence from a member or a party.
These rules apply everywhere on the site. Follow what changes in the site updates. All the content on the site is free.